Showing posts with label Good faith estimate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Good faith estimate. Show all posts

Friday, October 24, 2014

EXCELLENT WORK BY THE CFPB HAS UPDATED DODD-FRANK: RESPA AND TILA DISCLOSURES!

CFPB Updates TILA-RESPA Readiness Guide for Mortgage Lenders

October 9th, 2014  |  by Jason Oliva Published in CFPBNewsReverse Mortgage  |  1 Comment
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has updated its Dodd-Frank Mortgage Rules Readiness Guide to help lenders and bankers assess their preparedness in complying with disclosures under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). 
Included in the updated guide is a summary of the mortgage rules and key amendments, a readiness questionnaire, a section on frequently asked questions, as well as additional tools and resources lenders and bankers can use in their efforts to comply with the new regulations. 
New to the updated version is the TILA-Respa Integrated Disclosure rule, which contains new requirements and two disclosure forms that consumers will receive in the process of applying for and consummating a mortgage loan. The rule also explains in detail how to fill out and use the forms. 
First, the Loan Estimate combines two existing forms, the Good Faith Estimate and the initial Truth in Lending disclosure into one form. This form, CFPB notes, must be provided to consumers no later than the third business day after they submit a loan application.
The Loan Estimate defines a loan application as having six of the seven elements that RESPA required: consumer’s name, income, social security number to obtain a credit report, property address, estimate of the value of the property and mortgage loan amount sought. The definition does not, however, include RESPA’s seventh, “catch-all term,” CFPB notes, which states “any other information deemed necessary by the loan originator.”
Second, the Closing Disclosure also combines two existing forms into one document: the Settlement Statement and Truth in Lending disclosures. CFPB urges that this document must be provided to consumers at least three business days before consummation of the loan.
“The forms use clear language and design to make it easier for consumers to locate key information, such as interest rate, monthly payments, and costs to close the loan,” CFPB states in the Readiness Guide. “The forms also provide more information to help consumers decide whether they can afford the loan and to facilitate comparison of the cost of different loan offers, including the cost of the loans over time.”
The TILA-RESPA rule applies to most closed-end consumer mortgages, but not to reverse mortgages, home equity lines of credit or mortgages secured by a mobile home or by a dwelling that is not attached to real property. Additionally, the rule also does not apply to loans made by individuals who are not considered “Creditors” under TILA because they make five or fewer mortgages in a year.
The amendments are effective for transactions for which the creditor receives an application on or after August 1, 2015.
CFPB will continue to provide updates to the rules when necessary, the agency said. Any updates will be posted, along with a summary of the changes, on the CFPB Regulatory Implementation webpage.  
View the CFPB Readiness Guide.
Written by Jason Oliva


CONSIDER THE RAMIFICATIONS, PEOPLE, AND LET YOUR THOUGHTS BE HEARD!!

Title Agents Happy Wells Will Do Closing Disclosure

OCT 22, 2014 5:25pm ET
 PRINT
 EMAIL
 REPRINTS
 COMMENT
 TWITTER
 LINKEDIN
 FACEBOOK
 GOOGLE+
There has been a mostly positive reaction among settlement agents over the news that Wells Fargo, the nation's No. 1 mortgage originator, plans to create and deliver the new Closing Disclosure to the consumer. The bank said in a communication to its settlement agents it is taking this action because Wells Fargo will have the legal liability associated with issuing the disclosure.

The new disclosure is set to be implemented on Aug. 1, 2015, and its creation is part of the Dodd-Frank Act's merger of the rules governing the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

"The lenders definitely feel that they are responsible for ultimately collecting and disclosing accurate fees and insuring that they adhere to all of the new tolerances and that disclosures are generated appropriately and at the right time," said Dan Sogorka, who is the president of RealEC Technologies, which is a part of Black Knight Financial. They also need to maintain evidence of compliance and some may feel that can happen with the current process, he continued.

Current practice is for the settlement agent to create the HUD-1 form. While Wells Fargo is out front in this issue, other lenders are still examining it and among the options they are considering is no change from what is being done currently.

This announcement, said Brian Benson, the CEO of ClosingCorp., "clearly has alarms ringing in compliance officer offices throughout the nation.

"Wells is generally regarded as a torch bearer for analysis and was known to have invested quite a bit of time studying this issue, so many lenders were waiting to see which way they would go on this."
ClosingCorp, which is headquartered in San Diego and whose primary product is called SmartGFE, a technology designed to take the guess work out of filling in fees on the GFE, was seeing a sizeable surge in interest both before and after the Wells announcement as lenders began to consider the practical burden of meeting the time and accuracy demands and their increased liability and exposure, Benson continued. Wells Fargo's actions "hit the nail on the head" for what most of the rest of the industry already knew, but they hadn't yet addressed.

"It is having an impact in vendor selection, their migration away from affiliated business arrangements, their concern for fee standardization, and their general tolerance for complexity. Conversations that were proceeding slowly with my team are suddenly being treated with urgency; they have done the math and talked to their peers out in industry, and they are telling us that they need our services to have the peace of mind that they will get to August 2015 in good standing," Benson said.

A small sampling of industry executives found most are still working through the matter. Only Freedom Mortgage of Mount Laurel, N.J., said it "expects to behave similarly [to Wells Fargo]. However, we have not established a time line," according to a statement from CEO Stan Middleman, who declined to make any further comment.

One industry executive who wished not to be identified because this matter is still under consideration at the institution said that the institution wants to support the people it works with and give them various options that meet the way they want to do business; that might include preparing the documents itself.
An attempt to reach Wells Fargo for comment was not returned by press time.

Black Knight, whose Real EC unit is based in Houston, is working with Wells Fargo and other lenders along with the various title insurance production platforms on this new disclosure as well as working on ways they all can change the consumer experience, said Sogorka.

The entire disclosure and closing process has to be redesigned from how it done today. But because there are so many moving parts (including other parties in a purchase transaction like the real estate agent) "focusing on any one single component is not going to get you where you need to be nor get us where we need to be collectively as an industry," Sogorka said.

Black Knight is bringing all of these parties to the table and work on getting any friction in the process eliminated. "We have to make the process work for everybody. If there are a certain number of lenders who say we want the settlement agent to continue to generate (the closing disclosure), as long as they can hit the regulatory requirements, that's probably OK."

But the larger lenders are indicating they are not comfortable with the settlement agent handling the closing disclosure, so it is likely Wells is leading the parade.

For some of the smaller lenders, things such as the increased cost related to upgrading technology to handle the disclosure could leave them relying on the status quo when August 2015 comes around.
But that could boomerang on them. There are more expenses to get into compliance, but if there is a problem, the fines are greater, Sokorga said. "They need to focus on leveraging technology and working with the right business partners hand-in-hand to put together the right process to protect everybody along the value chain."

From the closing agent perspective, the reaction to what Wells Fargo is doing has been a mixed bag.
The few title industry members that responded to an American Land Title Association post on LinkedIn about this tended to be happy that Wells Fargo is taking the initiative regarding this change.

Consumers are free to choose their own closing agents and one poster expressed concern that having the lender prepare the documents could impact on the consumer's ability to work with the closing agent of their choice.

There has been a task force set up by ALTA to discuss the RESPA-TILA merger, where this has been a hot topic of discussion.

The mixed reaction by its membership is understandable, said Michelle Korsmo, the chief executive of ALTA. "It's a change in the way business happens and so until you have time to really think through how it will affect your business, there is cause to be skeptical."

Wells Fargo has done an informational meeting with settlement agents and there was a two-way discussion about why the lender is taking this action combined with ALTA member concerns about the proposal, she said.

What she has found is that after discussion and where it addresses the liability issue, settlement agents understand why Wells Fargo made this decision.

The new form is such a radical change in the disclosure process that everyone is a little nervous about making sure the document is delivered properly, while still serving the needs of the homebuyer and making sure their business-to-business relationships with industry service providers is working well, Korsmo continued.

When it comes to the disclosure process, which can vary from company to company, "getting everybody on one page would be useful. But at the same time [loan closing] practices are very local," she said, pointing out that things are done differently in each state (in some states, an attorney handles the closing) and in some cases done differently depending on which part of the state you are in.
Furthermore, each lender has its own loan closing instructions that are different from the competition's. The biggest lesson from the implementation of the qualified mortgage rule for settlement agents is to follow those closing instructions closely," Korsmo noted.

When it comes to having proof that the disclosure complies with the law, ALTA is telling its members to work with the lender to ensure there is a record of the accuracy of the disclosure and when the customer received the disclosure. They need to have "a trail to provide evidence of compliance, regardless of it being the lender or the settlement company providing that information," Korsmo said.
A key point to remember in the process is that many purchase transactions are interlinked with one or two other home sale transactions; typically the buyer is selling his or her old home and the seller is buying his or her next one. So if the timing requirements of delivering the closing disclosure is missed, other transactions could be affected, she pointed out.

With all the changes happening to the process, lenders are being conservative in their approach, said Gregory Teal, the president and CEO of Ernst Publishing Co., an Albany, N.Y-based provider of data used to populate the GFE.

"In our area of expertise — third-party fees — we see that this rule requires an accounting of very subtle differences and enhanced levels of granularity. With that in mind, we are being asked by many in the industry to work directly with their compliance departments and provide assistance in interpreting the various rule enhancements, such as identifying the actual taxing authority and determining who is responsible for each tax-related item delineated on the disclosure forms. The rule demands that this information be specific and prevents lenders from simply showing the total amount due."

"This will, initially, make the process a little more cumbersome and there will be levels of nuance not accounted for that will need to be fleshed out in this new process over the first year or so of rule enforcement. Ultimately, I believe, the lender and the industry will provide a more accurate and easily readable disclosure for both the loan estimate and the closing disclosure," Teal said.

The work going on right now by the industry in combining RESPA and TILA is a change to enhance the consumer experience when it comes to getting a mortgage.

The next 10 months will put a lot of pressure on settlement agents, Korsmo said. But ALTA and its members have been working on creating new processes since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unveiled the disclosure last November.

Going forward through to next August, the focus for settlement service providers should be on training their employees as well as conducting educational classes for real estate agents, she said.
It is all about the creating the best customer experience possible.

"When I talk to my employees and my business partners, I talk about August 2015 is not the end, that's not the goal line. That is really the beginning. And if we keep working together, we can make a better consumer experience," Sokorga stated.

Korsmo added, "In order for this to be a good experience for the consumer, it's all got to work well."

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

NEIL GARFIELD RESPONDS TO A COMMENT PLANTED BY A WELLS FARGO PAID OFFICER WHO FAILS IN AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE HOMEOWNERS FEEL GUILTY!! GOD BLESS YOU NEIL FOR CONSTANTLY STAYING ON TOP OF THEM!

TEACHING MOMENT
Posted on January 18, 2011 by Neil Garfield

Thanks to Karl Denninger, we now know that the email came from the Wells block of IP addresses. Special message to the idiot calling himself or herself FEDup, you have denigrated a perfectly valid web site www.fedupusa.com. So if you are truly FEDup you musst be referring to what you put in your mouth.

FROM KARL DENNINGER

This is a plant from Wells Fargo (the post came from their IP block) and has ZERO affiliation with FedupUSA, which posts over on my forum as well as on their own blog.

Needless to say I’m in contact with them on this and I suspect the owners of FedUp (I’m not an officer, but they are!) will be dealing with this shortly.

THIS IS PROBABLY ANOTHER “PLANT” PIECE TO MAKE PEOPLE FEEL GUILTY ABOUT DEFENDING THEIR PROPERTY AND THEIR LIFE STYLE SO DON’T TAKE IT ALL TOO SERIOUSLY. 

But it does present a teaching moment for virtually all homeowners who secretly harbor the idea that this whole mortgage mess and their own mortgage mess is their own fault. We have all developed a sense of being moral persons and paying our bills is one of the ways we demonstrate our morality. So if we don’t pay our morals are low and if we DO pay then our morals are high. Right?

BUT WHAT IF THE BILL IS WRONG? ARE WE IMMORAL IF WE CONTEST IT? What is it about the Banks that because they say something it is presumed true? I find the same people who are angry about the bank bailout in 20028 (Bush)-2009 (Obama) are the ones talking about the morality of paying your bills and presuming the bill for these scrambled mortgages is correct. They are the same people who vote for candidates who keep the bankruptcy code as is — if you own an apartment building you can force the amount due to the value of the property — but if you own just one apartment, you can’t. Both seem to be moral in their eyes. You would think that if it is immoral to seek relief or defend a foreclosure action against one living unit that the immorality would be multiplied by doing for multiple living units. 

Apparently not since Chapter 11 allows the owner to cram down the “bill” to a lower amount than the amount he borrowed but Chapter 13 doesn’t allow the “bill” to be corrected by falling market conditions or even fraud.

So my answers are shown below in bold, and your comments are invited.

Here is the data on the person who submitted this comment on this blog. Go to work folks!

FedUp
ykadafi96@hotmail.com
151.151.16.13
Submitted by FEDup on 2011/01/17 at 9:46 am
I’m fed up too. It is obvious that the rug was pulled out from our economy by these banks who kept getting paid for the same thing over and over again. Sorry to introduce actual facts as opposed to random ideology.

I have done my very best to try and understand where borrowers are coming from in this day and time, but it’s getting so out of control, I can’t take it anymore. If you really studied what actually happened instead of just reading ideological blogs and media, then you would have no trouble understanding where these people were coming from. You might disagree but you would be able to see their point. They were given fraudulent appraisals by an entity posing as a lender when the real lender was hidden from view. They were given the fraudulent misimpression that underwriting standards were being applied to their loans and the “experts” had approved their loan on the basis that yes there is a high likelihood this transaction would work.

We live in a country full of “entitlement”. Everyone wants to point the finger at someone else and NO ONE wants to take responsibility for their own actions. Yes like you and whoever hired you to write this piece. Misdirection is the hallmark of the bank strategy. They want us to look at these terrible borrowers who all woke up one morning, all 20 million of them, and had a secret meeting to bring down the finance world using sophisticated “innovative” financial products which Alan Greenspan even admitted he didn’t understand. The Banks point the finger away from their own fraud and negligence and refuse to take responsibility for the mayhem they created.

Did it ever occur to you people even once, that the reason your homes are getting foreclosed on is because YOU DIDN’T PAY YOUR BILL? But people attitude now a days is that they shouldn’t have to pay their mortgage to remain in their home. Well, isn’t that a sweet deal! Actually yes it did occur to all of us that we weren’t paying a bill and we suffered over the decision that we couldn’t do it, since the information we had was faulty and the assumptions were wrong, all of which was known to everyone except the borrower. And NO people are not out to get a free house, they are out to clean house — straighten out the title that got messed up by the expert bankers, and find out how much is really due UNDER LAW and the identity of the person(s) to whom they owe an obligation UNDER LAW. But it seems you don’t have any respect for the law, you want these people to pay anybody who asks for money whether they are the creditor or not. If you like that system, in the future, please send your car payments to your next door neighbor, he needs the money more than the finance company.

let me let you in a little secret…YOU sat down at the attorneys office for closing and read over your mortgage, outlining the loan amount, terms of the note, and YOUR OBLIGATION to repay the loan. If you chose not to repay the loan, you SIGNED an agreement the mortgage company could take possession of the property to secure their interest against the note. Oh now I see the light. What a secret! Except that first, even if they read and understood every word of what was presented to them, they would not have known the deal — the rest was being hidden. Second, nobody reads every word of the documents and nobody understands them. I have facts — actual surveys of hundreds of people including lawyers who closed on their own homes and for clients. Out of more than 500 people surveyed exactly one person, a mortgage broker had read his documents, and no, he didn’t understand them. Third the LEGAL obligation of the LENDER who was not disclosed to present all the facts in a good faith estimate (GFE) and Settlement Statement is a condition PRECEDENT (i.e., before) the obligation arises. Gibberish you say? OK next time you go to a car dealer and they say they have a car for you and that the charge will be $40,000 see how you feel about it when they refuse to tell you anything about the car until AFTER you paid the $40,000.

What likely happened is you took out a loan far too large for your income, based on what you anticipated happening in the future, i.e. raises, new job, increased income, increase in property value, etc…and when it didn’t work out the way you planned, you are not grown up enough to accept YOU made a mistake, NOT the lender or anyone else. That’s the problem with this country, no one owns up to their mistakes. Instead they start crying “the lender loaned me too much money, it’s not my fault they loaned me more than I could afford.” Here’s a wild thought, TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS. Instead of crying that the lender is in the wrong for allowing you to borrower too much money, how about owning up to the fact that YOU took out a loan that YOU couldn’t afford. nice try! Now try some truth and facts.

Or another of my favorites, i see this mostly in bankruptcy cases, ” Motion to value collateral – my property isn’t worth as much as I owe on my loan, therefore i don’t believe i should have to pay the entire loan, and i want the court to make my lender reduce my balance to the current market value.” Are you **** kidding me? Please try to call the NYSE and tell them that your current shares of XYZ Corp are less than what you bought them for, and you don’t believe you should lose money, so you want them to either raise the price of the shares so you can get your money back. PLEASE so that, and then tell me how fast you get laughed off the phone. Purchasing a home is an investment just like a stock, it may go up or down in value, thats the risk you take when you sign the mortgage. You do not have the right to cry about your investment decreasing in value and now you want your lender to reduce your obligation so that you’re even again. Wow, I;m at a loss for words, thats all I can really say without sounding obscene. Well then you ought to go march on Washington because anyone who owns a multi-unit apartment building can do exactly what find so disgusting UNDER LAW. Single family homeowners want the same rights but can’t get it. Which do YOU think is more disgusting?

And finally, the article above…Wells Fargo “duped” me into a loan mod to stop foreclosure. You are so correct on this one. Your lender cared enough about the American homeowner that they doubled, and sometimes tripled or more their loss mitigation staff in order to try to save borrowers homes. I’m sorry if it offends anyone, but you people make me sick physically. Your lender has NO OBLIGATION to offer you any type of loan modification. In my personal opinion, if this is the thanks they’re going to receive I wish all lenders would simply stop offering mods, and start foreclosing on all you deadbeats who don’t want to take responsibility for your own actions. This part is what clearly identifies you as a paid heckler for the banks. First Wells Fargo never owned the mortgage so their attempt to distract everyone from that fact and the fact that the mortgage, note and obligation are hopelessly obscured by the action of who? Wells Fargo, that’s who! The longer they strong out the borrower, the more money they make at the expense of anyone who has a pension and anyone who could afford that house if the appraisal had not been fudged and if the loan terms were not so tricky. You now how many types of mortgages there were in the 1970′s? 4-5. You know how many types of mortgages were offered by an army of sellers (thousands of whom were convicted felons for economic crimes) in the time leading up to the mortgage “crisis”? Over 400.

Just a little fun fact for you who think that your mortgage companies are evil and only want to take the poor american’s home away and laugh while doing so: The average delinquency of a property foreclosed on by Wells Fargo was 16 months behind in payments. That means, on average, Wells Fargo gave homeowners 1 year, and 4 months to either complete a loan mod, pay their mortgage current, or sell the property before foreclosure. Let’s look at it another way, Wells allowed the average borrower who lost their home to live in their property free for 1 year, and 4 months before FINALLY giving up and foreclosing. I’m sure you wacko’s will find a way to spin that to the negative as well, so whatever. This also identifies who is paying you and who probably wrote this for you. Wells Fargo posed as the LENDER when they never had a nickle in the deal. They posed as the creditor at auction and “bought” the property with a note payable to someone else. And the reason for the time delays was sheer volume — the decision to take the house and the homeowner think they were in modification or settlement process was merely a ruse to get large payments that would have otherwise brought the mortgage current but for the ridiculous and fictitious fees, interests and costs attached. Why? Because of someone actually paid every nickle, and many did try to do just that, there was nobody who could sign a satisfaction of mortgage. Why? Because nobody on Wall Street knows or cares who has any rights, if any, under the obligation, note or mortgage.

Last fun fact…your mortgage company does NOT want your house back. banks are in the business of lending money, not flipping real estate. This is exactly why Wells Fargo gives the avg foreclosure 1 year, 4 months to work something out before taking the house. THEY DON”T WANT YOUR HOUSE! What they do want….is for your to take responsibility as an adult and PAY YOUR BILLS. But that’s clearly too much to ask of the average american homeowner now a days. AGAIN, I SAY YOU ARE A SHILL FOR THE BANKS! “your mortgage company” is neither identified nor consistent. The note and mortgage were passed around amongst a dozen people feeding out of the trough, including the taxpayer trough where more money was given to them than any default or collection of defaults. The entity you identify as a mortgage company is a sham entity without any authority, ownership or anything at risk. THEY DO WANT THE HOUSE but your right, they don’t want the house BACK because they never had any right to it in the first place.

instead, you look for every single little random detail and try to pick it apart an exploit it to your benefit. Guess what Pick-a-payment customers, you knew that choosing the least amount you could pay was not going to satisfy your mortgage, that option was meant to HELP YOU OUT IN A BIND if you came up short one month, (again bad, bad, evil lender for offering borrowers some help in a bind) but instead of using it the way it was designed, YOU chose to pay the lowest you could every month, likely because you took out a mortgage that was too much for you, and based your ability to pay it back on what the lowest amount you could pay every month without going into default. And then when you noticed you’re property value going down, and your payment going up (because you haven’t even been paying the interest amount each month), you start crying unfair lending practices. Boohoo. How about you take responsibility for the fact that you took out a loan too big to handle, and made a bad decision. BOO-HOO? You trivialize the fall of Wall Street as though we don’t have an effective unemployment rate of 20% like a Banana Republic. The ones who over-leveraged, as it is agreed by every economist financier, finance pundit and expert in trading exotic instruments were the banks far more than any homeowner. THAT is what caused these problems. And the way they they used leverage was by taking a piece of property worth $100,000, jacking up the appraised value to $200,000 and then selling it 5 times in different ways for $1,000,000. You can if you want to, you would cry to if it happened to you. If borrowers knew that 12 people were feeding off their transaction and it was disclosed what figures were being exchanged, they would have assumed correctly that they could get a better deal elsewhere. If investors knew the true facts and had not depended upon their appraisers (rating agencies) they would never have parted with a cent — so there would have been no money to fund mortgages.

Just wait for the day when lenders stop loaning money to anyone without an 800 credit score and never missed a single payment, and the mortgage payment not to exceed 20% of their income. That’ll just give you cry babies something else to cry and sue about. Good Luck.

When all else fails, scare the shit out of them. When lending standards tighten up, make sure it is the borrowers who are blamed not the banks. Ah FEDup, if you really want people to take responsibility for their actions, the risks they take etc. I suggest you start with yourself, selling out to the highest bidder so that your country can continue to suffer. Come clean, and we’ll back you up. Don’t come clean and we’ll expose you.
Enhanced by Zemanta

DO YOU NEED HELP TO AVOID FORECLOSURE?

If you would like to receive information on how you might avoid the foreclosure of your home, please e-mail me your name, address, and phone number. Someone from our office will be in touch right away to assist you. With Warm Regards, Kelly L. Hansen, HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS, ctsmyhon@yahoo.com
Be happy, healthy and prosperous, but most of all, be blessed.
Kelly L. Hansen's photo.

Kelly L. Hansen


Jurisdictionary® just click on the link
Make Sure Your Attorney Is Working For You!
Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION
33605 W. 88th Street
De Soto, KS 66018
913-269-0399 Phone
888-881-2349 Fax
MORTGAGE FRAUD VICTIMS
ARE YOU A VICTIM OF MORTGAGE FRAUD?


PLEASE DONATE TO HELP HOMEOWNERS!