Two “Original” Wet Ink Notes
Submitted in the Same Case
by the Florida Default Law Group and JPMorgan Chase
Published April 27, 2010
Be it a Pleading, a BOGUS Assignment, a Fabricated Note, a Forgery, or an Assistant Attorney General that works for both the AG Office and a Foreclosure Mill at the same time…Here is a new little game I am going to play. Each week I will be taking ten random foreclosure cases out of the Palm Beach County court house and picking out the one that has the most fraudulent document in the file.
Two “Original” Fabricated Notes?
In my last Foreclosure Fraud of the Week we talked about Poor Photo Shop skills.
This week we will expand on that topic.
Hold onto your hats. This one could possibly be a game changer.
Below are TWO “Original” Wet Ink Notes submitted in the same OPEN case by the notorious Florida Default Law Group.
One submitted by Ms. Ashleigh Politano Esq and the other by Tamara M. Walters Esq.
I am very grateful for this find since it corroborates some theories I have had.
I personally believe, that in most cases, the “Original” notes are purely high quality COPIES. The reason I say this is because almost EVERY “Original” note I examine, the blue “wet ink” signature is always the same odd colored blue. You know, the blue that comes off a printer or copy machine. I have yet to find that same elusive blue colored pen in any stationary store.
I think that the Foreclosure Mills and the Default Processing firms have electronic copies of the notes and just print them out however they need them, or they just replace the last page with a fabricated one that is endorsed to the plaintiff.
Not only that, the last page of the note, in many cases, is a different quality paper then the first few pages.
Now I know these are some conspiracy theorist type allegations, so bear with me and see for yourselves below.
Most judges do not want to hear those theories, so lets take it a step further to possibly opening their eyes.
Remember that these are both “Original” Notes filed in the same case, both with “wet ink” signatures, by the Florida Default Law Group, so they should be identical, right?
I took the liberty on taking screen shots of the “Notes” where I thought there might be frauds perpetrated on the court.
Examine the full Certified Copies below to compare…
I labeled them;
NOTE ONE (Submitted by Ashleigh Politano Esq)
and
NOTE TWO (Submitted by Tamara M. Walters Esq)
I highly doubt that the TRUE note holder had both of these as originals on hand.
Worm your way out of this one FDLG…
There are more to come…
Enjoy!
4closureFraud
UPDATE 04/29/10
UPDATE 04/29/10
Click on Images to Enlarge
Notices of Filing Original “Notes”
1st Page of Notes
Payments
1st Page of Notes
VOID
Last Page of Notes
Documentary Tax
Last Page of Notes
Borrowers Signature
Last Page of Notes
Endorsement to Plaintiff by Plaintiff
Last Page of Notes
Original Endorsement to VOID
NOTE ONE
(Submitted by Ashleigh Politano)
Defendant has retained counsel
(Submitted by Ashleigh Politano)
Defendant has retained counsel
NOTE TWO
(Submitted by Tamara M. Walters)
Note Two See 4closurefraud.org for Details
Defendant has retained counsel
(Submitted by Tamara M. Walters)
Note Two See 4closurefraud.org for Details
Defendant has retained counsel
12 Responses to “Foreclosure Fraud of the Week – Two “Original” Wet Ink Notes Submitted in the Same Case by the Florida Default Law Group and JPMorgan Chase”
– Foreclosure mill attorney Michael Barrett.
“They just create one for the most part sometimes, and
the servicer signs it themselves saying that it’s (sic) been
transferred to whatever entity they name as applicant”.
(page 28, line 10)
First American added:
(page 33, line 5)
ForeclosureHamlet.org
ForeclosureHamlet.org