Showing posts with label Home insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Home insurance. Show all posts

Thursday, October 16, 2014

MFI-MIAMI = MORTGAGE FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS!! CHECK THEM OUT. THEY'VE BEEN DOING CREDIBLE FORENSIC LOAN AUDITS FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

Mortgage Loan Fraud Assessment based upon Susp...
Mortgage Loan Fraud Assessment based upon Suspicious Activity Report Analysis (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

MFI-Miami

Mortgage Fraud Investigations

What We Do

In a nutshell, what we do is rip apart the mortgage looking for anything that will assist you or your attorney in helping you keep your home, level the playing field in a modification negotiation or help you negotiate a short sale. We are just a compliance and securitization investigative company. We are not attorneys and we do not give legal advice nor do we assist in any type of negotiations for modifications. We just simply give you and your attorney the tools to negotiate a modification or defend a foreclosure action. Once the review is complete, we will refer you to an attorney that can assist you fighting the foreclosure or help with the modification

Loan Regulations

The Compliance Review consists of reviewing to see if any federal or state laws were violated when the loan was being originated. This includes RESPA, TILA, FDCPA, Section 5 of the FTC Act, HOEPA, which covers high cost loans, Consumer Protection Act and any state statutes. We also look for UCC violations. Compliance is important because the way the loan was structured dictates how or if it could be sold on the secondary market.

Compare With Lender Documents

Unlike our competitors, we look at more than just the closing documents you received at your closing.  We order the documents directly from the mortgage servicer. We do this for two reasons. One, because the examiner wants to make sure the lender’s documents match what you received at closing. For example, the Truth-In-Lending statements, mortgage, note and all the disclosures must have identical figures and statements. Two, to ensure your signature is consistent throughout the whole file. This is because 9 out of 10 times you were given unsigned copies of their documents at closing due to the fact they were prepared prior to the closing.

Appraisal Review

We do this for multiple reasons. We want to see if the value was pushed higher than its actual value.  This plays an important role.  An argument could be made that says you are overpaying on the mortgage because the loan is based on a percentage of the value.  For example, when you walk into either the broker or the lender’s office, the loan officer already knows what program you can receive based on your credit report, what LTV you qualify for and how high of a dollar value they need to get the file closed.  In most cases, it is the lender or the broker who order the appraisal and the appraiser is all too happy to oblige them since it means more business.
A fraudulent appraisal is also important because an argument can be made that the underwriter for the originating lender should have caught any appraisal problems and therefore the loan should not have been funded. If the loan was securitized, the Depositor’s (the entity putting the transaction together on the secondary market) due diligence department should have caught any problems in the appraisal (or any other problems) before assigning the loan into a Trust.

Public Records

The first thing the examiner does is to check the chain of assignments filed with the county where the property is located. In many states, only the owner of record is allowed to foreclose. The owner of the mortgage must be recorded in the county records before a foreclosure can be initiated and proper chain of ownership must be evident.  The examiner also checks for “robo-signing”.  Robo-signing is when a signature of the person signing the mortgage assignment or affidavit does not belong to the person signing the document.  Examiner also verifies the signatures of the Notary who claims to have witnessed and verified the signature of the individual who signed the mortgage assignment or affidavit.
Mortgage Backed Security Trust 
The securitization process is essentially what happens after the loan is closed and the initial lender has sold off your loan. In most cases you now have two main parties of interest involved in the file. The Servicer acts as collection agent for the Trustee who oversees the Trust. A Trust is another name for the mortgage pool your loan is in. This means you could have Bank of America servicing a loan that is owned by Wells Fargo with JPMorgan-Chase acting as the Trustee for Wells Fargo. For example the trust could read: JPMorgan-Chase National Trust as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Backed Security 2007-A1B1.

Prospectus

Examiner reviews the prospectus. This is important because this is the instrument that is used by the Depositors in the sales pitch to prospective investors for the mortgage-backed security the note is in. It specifies what types of loans will be placed in the pool. For example, the prospectus may dictate the trust will only accept 30 year fixed mortgages.
If the loan doesn’t fit into the perimeters of the Prospectus then an argument can be made that the loan was fraudulently securitized and therefore the ownership of the note is invalid. This is kind of like buying a stolen car. If you buy a stolen car even unknowingly, it’s not your car.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement

The examiner investigates is the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or PSA.  The PSA is important because it defines the relationship between the Trustee, Depositor and the Servicer. It specifies who the Master Servicer is and who is allowed to be a sub-servicer and if what authority they have to modify or foreclose on your loan and if they do or do not have to seek investor approval.
The PSA also specifies if there is an insurance policy in place to protect the investor in case the loans in the pool stop performing or if the bond rating of the pool drops. It will also specify what the triggers are that activate the policy that pay off the investors.  If this does happen then an argument can be made that the mortgage is now paid.  This is similar to you getting into a car accident and totaling your car.  The insurance company pays off the lien holder and the lien is extinguished.   Your debt is now considered paid.
This is important because if the Trust is paid in full by the insurance policy, then the outstanding balance of the pool is now paid including the client’s mortgage. If it does happen, usually the servicer will buy the note for pennies on the dollar and still attempt to keep collecting payments on the note. If this does happen you may have a cause of action against the servicer for fraud.

Note Ownership

The examiner reviews all filings, schedules and exhibits to see if the note is actually in the Trust. If the note is not in there, then its game over for the Trustee and the servicer because now you as the homeowner have absolute proof the lender lacks legal standing to execute the terms of the mortgage. This also has the possibility of setting up the law firm handling the foreclosure for a claim of defrauding the court and misrepresentation.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

ANOTHER WAY TO LOOK AT STRATEGIC DEFAULT

What are YOUR thoughts on “Strategic Foreclosure?”

The number of prime mortgages facing foreclosure has shot up 425 percent since 2008 due to falling home values and rising unemployment. And if you purchased your home at the peak of the real estate market from 2004 to 2006, your value has substantially dropped. While these numbers may be irrelevant to some borrowers, those who are able to afford their mortgage payment and plan on residing in their home for a decade or more, others have simply given up in the hope of forcing a short-sale or principal reduction.
The real questions is, should you walk away from your mortgage even if you can afford the payment? Millions of Americans are asking themselves that same question. Some borrowers feel they have a legal, moral, and ethical obligation to make payments notwithstanding a substantial drop in value. But with 17.4 million U.S. residential homes under water, a growing number of individuals are contemplating walking away from the place they call home.
If you can resolve yourself to possible litigation and a lower credit score for several years, walking away may be a smart business decision. Although strategic foreclosure is hot topic, only small percentage of borrowers are actually contemplating this technique at present. A recent study, however, found that approximately 32 percent of homeowners nationwide would consider walking away from their mortgage if the value of their home continues to decrease.
Why aren’t more distressed homeowners taking this route? While “strategic foreclosure” makes economic sense, many homeowners do not choose this course of action out of shame, guilt and fear. Underwater homeowners continue to stress over their mortgage payments to avoid the consequence of foreclosure and a perceived negative social stigma within the community. This is especially so when a borrower has the financial ability to pay. What do you think? Is strategic foreclosure an immoral copout or savvy financial move? Why?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 1, 2011

$50,000 GRANTS TO HOMEOWNERS?


HUD Emergency Homeowners' Loan Program (EHLP)

EHLP Overview

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act provided $1 billion to HUD to implement the Emergency Homeowners' Loan Program (EHLP).
Features
The EHLP is designed to provide mortgage payment relief to eligible homeowners experiencing a drop in income of at least 15% directly resulting from involuntary unemployment or underemployment due to adverse economic conditions and/or a medical emergency. Other EHLP eligibility requirements include:

EHLP funds will be used to assist borrowers in Puerto Rico and the 32 states not funded through theTreasury's Innovation Fund for Hardest Hit Housing Market program.

Additional program information is available on the following web pages:


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

RANDOLPH FRODSHAM "OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM HAS SETUP A NO-WIN SITUATION FOR THE HOMEOWNER IN THIS COUNTRY WHO HAS SUFFERED FROM THE ILLEGAL ACTS OF THE BANKING INDUSTRY”

From: Randolph Frodsham
To: ctsmyhon@yahoo.com
Sent: Sun, April 3, 2011 2:23:24 PM
Subject: California foreclosures

I am NOT an attorney. (I think that's clear enough to make the point.) I am an ex-State employee (worked for about 20 years as an investigator for the Transportation Division of the State of California Public Utilities Commission). In CA to have a statute making it a felony to record a false document the affects the title of any residential property of 4 or fewer units. (I've attached a copy of PC 115. PC 115.5 is the penalty section. All bolding is mine.) During my career I prepared and submitted reports wherein I alleged certain violations of the Public Utilities Code to reviewing deputy DA's around Southern California. I must have prepared and submitted 300-400 such reports during my career all resulting in the deputy DA preparing complaints which I signed as complainant and then filed with the court. Of all the complaints filed, about a handful went to trial; and, of those, I lost once.

As you know, California is non-judicial. I believe that 99.9% of all Notices of Default recorded in the past several years have contained at least one false statement, in that all of these recorded documents say that the beneficiary (lender) has "deposited" the (original) deed of trust and all documents evidencing the debt (that should be the note) with the trustee who actually conducts the foreclosure process that ends with the sale. The reason I say 99.9% (instead of 100%) is to allow for any foreclosing 'hard-money' loans where the lender does, in fact, have possession of the original (wet-sig) promissory note and deed of trust.

Even given the severe budgetary issues every level of government is suffering today, in the two counties where homeowners have submitted reports I have helped prepare, there is absolutely no interest on the part of anyone who could prosecute. (I'll send a copy of my reports if interested.) This may well be due to the conflict of interest that exists on two levels; first, being civil servants that participate in the CalPERS retirement system, ultimately, their (and almost all other civil service types) retirement fund would be negatively impacted if court cases started going against mortgage holders so that the value of mortgage-backed securities (MBSs) - of which CalPERS holds more than $12 BILLION - and security values declined as a result. Additionally, every County where homeowners have submitted the reports I've prepared to the reviewing deputy DA (that reviewing deputy is a County employee) holds millions of dollars worth of investments in MBSs. (Copies of CAFRs - Combined Annual Financial Reports - available upon request as well.)

Though I am more fortunate than most (I was kinda dumb too in that I was a good little boy who diligently paid off my mortgage), I want to help the homeowners, distressed and otherwise, who are being screwed by this system. I have been warned on several quarters about "practicing law without a license," which I address by telling the truth because I merely assist the homeowner in the preparation of the report. The homeowner knows that, if there should be any court action, THEY will be the one on the witness stand as they are the victim in this situation, not me.

Do you believe my interest in the criminal aspect is a waste or do you feel their may be some way to insight some real interest, and ultimately action, to address the criminal side of this?
--
Randy Frodsham


On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Kelly L. Hansen wrote:

Randolph,

First and foremost, thank you for stepping forward. Second, may I have your permission to post what you have written? If yes, do you have conditions?

I think your letter has extremely valuable information of which homeowners, lenders, investors, and the judicial system should avail themselves.

I hope to hear from you.

Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION, INC.

From: Randolph Frodsham
To: Kelly L. Hansen
Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 4:04:08 PM
Subject: Re: California foreclosures

I just received a replacement dsl modem yesterday, so am finally back online with reasonable stability. I didn't see anything more from you since my last feeble response when I was having so much trouble with my isp service but I don't know it you may have attempted to contact me again.

FYI, about 3 weeks ago, during the last congressional recess, I went to visit my U.S. Representative, Darryl Issa, at his district office in Vista, CA. While I was there, he came into his office and I had an opportunity to have an albiet brief, conversation with him about the current mortgage situation. During our conversation, he made a comment that really tells the whole store.

He said, "We can't let the banks fail."

 This told me that, as a sitting congressman, he knows which side his bread is buttered on. Other than the power of the ballot box, I don't know how else to argue with that line of thought.


Randy

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Kelly L. Hansen wrote:

There is a big difference between letting the banks fail, and having them making appropriate recompense. They can make appropriate ($25B), or necessary ($135B) recompense, and they would never fail!

The Banks need to quit whining about what they don't want to do, and step up and fix the problems they have caused.

Please write me ASAP.

Thanks so much Randolph.
Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION, INC.

I have no problem with my name appearing. What I wrote to you I firmly believe to be true. I welcome any information that might show that I am wrong. I believe that our entire judicial system with its retirement benefits package and investments made by various government entities have setup a no-win situation for the homeowner in this country who has suffered from the illegal acts of the banking industry.

The government entities and retirement funds were lied to and snookered into purchasing investment instruments by the investment rating companies that said that the MBS investments were AAA rated when, in fact, they should have been rated B or C at best. All the pension funds were rolling in cash until the market fell out on the MBSs. Now there are trillions of dollas of shortages that the public employee unions and government entities are expecting the taxpayer to bail out. Whyisit that seemingly no one wants to talk about the real root of this problem and who deserves to pay. The pension funds need to be made whole, but not at the expense of the innocent taxpayor.

Randy












Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 28, 2011

HOMEOWNERS WIN APPEAL IN WISCONSIN - TRIAL COURT REVERSED

AURORA NOT THE OWNER OF THE MORTGAGE NOTE--HOMEOWNERS WIN APPEAL -- TRIAL COURT REVERSED
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Who Certifies Forensic Loan Auditors to conduct Mortgage Fraud Investigations?

Mortgage Loan Fraud Assessment based upon Susp...Image via WikipediaWHO TRAINS
FORENSIC LOAN AUDITORS 
TO LEARN HOW TO THOROUGHLY CONDUCT 
MORTGAGE FRAUD INVESTIGATION REPORTS 
ADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE
IN A COURT OF LAW?


Please fax your program information to 866-409-9552 Fax, or mail it to my address below.  Thank you for your help!



Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION, INC.
  
"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty"
-Thomas Jefferson



"The goal of life is to open the heart to eternity before death arrives."

My Photo
Jurisdictionary® just click on the link
make sure your attorney is working for YOU! (and not for the opposing team!!)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 24, 2011

LOCAL HUD REP CLARK HAGGARD OF SOUTHWEST HOUSING SOLUTIONS WHY AREN'T YOU DOING YOUR JOB? START HELPING HOMEOWNERS OR GET THE HECK OUT OF THERE!

Hey Kelly,

I found your website this morning. Great Information.

We were in different loan modification programs with Wells Fargo for 18 months. They put us in one program after another and even told us last summer we made too much income for a modification.  We made our recommended monthly payment for 24 months. We got a letter in October saying we were in a program. Then in October when we called in to make a payment they wouldn't accept it and said we were in Foreclosure. The loan modification representative says we are still in the program!  The costs associated with the foreclosure are accelerating the principal balance way beyond what we could of payed had WF even talked to us before handing it over to an attorney. 

We just got the notice for a Rule 120 hearing and may get a chance there to postpone the foreclosure. The local hud Representative Clark Haggard of Southwest Housing solutions has done nothing. He won't even return a phone call. Unfortunately we waited on him for help he offered. Can I forward a letter to Wells Fargo exec's listed on your website and possibly get someone to talk to us. We have offered money for back charges etc. and they won't talk to us. It's unbelievable WF would foreclose on someone who is making payments to them. You know what we have equity and they want our house!

Thank You ,

J.


My Dear Friend J.


You can write Cara Heiden, CEO of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, her e-mail address is cara.heiden@wellsfargo.com.

Now, here me, and here me well:  thousands of letters are telling me the same exact story you have just told me.  And many times, many, many times, Wells Fargo will make offers to stop (if the homeowners is willing to pay more money) and after they receive thousands of dollars from homeowners, Wells Fargo will go ahead and foreclose EVEN WITH MODIFICATION AND FORBEARANCECONTRACTS IN PLACE.

The very best thing you can do, and the only thing that stops Wells Fargo from foreclosing, is filing a personal cause of action against them.  Please, even if you write Cara Heiden, and I encourage you to do so, file a personal cause of action against Wells Fargo for Breach of Contract, and for a million other things they are most likely guilty of in your jurisdiction, with which your attorney can help you.

Do Not Wait.  Absolutely Do Not Wait.  Every second counts...  THEY DON'T NEED A REASON, THEY ARE JUST DOING IT.
 Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION, INC.

Enhanced by Zemanta

DO YOU NEED HELP TO AVOID FORECLOSURE?

If you would like to receive information on how you might avoid the foreclosure of your home, please e-mail me your name, address, and phone number. Someone from our office will be in touch right away to assist you. With Warm Regards, Kelly L. Hansen, HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS, ctsmyhon@yahoo.com
Be happy, healthy and prosperous, but most of all, be blessed.
Kelly L. Hansen's photo.

Kelly L. Hansen


Jurisdictionary® just click on the link
Make Sure Your Attorney Is Working For You!
Kelly L. Hansen
HOMEOWNERS HELPING HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION
33605 W. 88th Street
De Soto, KS 66018
913-269-0399 Phone
888-881-2349 Fax
MORTGAGE FRAUD VICTIMS
ARE YOU A VICTIM OF MORTGAGE FRAUD?


PLEASE DONATE TO HELP HOMEOWNERS!